diversions

so since its currently summer there won't be much on pattern recognition showing up here. I used to just have that sort of thing swimming around in my head all the time because I was always writing programs and taking adderall. Later on this year when fall semester gets going I'll be prongramming more and I'll have more to say.


As for now I have good news. The theories and tactics I have been using for my pattern recog and AI programs have already been discovered by someone else. Jeff Hawkins of the Redmond Center for Theoretical Neuroscience has already come up with it and he named it the Memory-Prediction Framework. Its described in his book, On Intelligence.

Probably not that amazing of an accomplishment considering that I educated myself in modern cognitive science but I still feel pretty proud that something I came up with mostly through introspection and lucid dreaming has also been discovered by a neuroscientist!

Reinventing cybernetics

Power measures the extent to which one can control one's environment. Control can only be accomplished when one understands the environmental system one wishes to control. Understanding of a system can only be had if one has the power to control for some variables while observing changes in others. power enables more science, science brings greater understanding, greater understanding yields more power. This amplifying feedback loop gives rise to the all too familiar and seemingly inevitable tendency of power to concentrate itself.

Couldn't a device be contrived to operate according to these principles? A tool that becomes more powerful with time? The answer, is yes. These miraculous devices are already produced in bulk all over the world. You already possess one, in your very skull.

The nervous system of Homo Sapiens may or may not operate according to different principles than the rest of the animal kingdom, but one thing is certain: there is a runaway feedback system at play. We become exponentially more powerful with the passage of time.

Consider a simple system S in an unknown environment with three inputs, a b and c and three outputs, x y and z.

The inputs are wired up to different sensors which each measure some unknown property the environment and represent it as a real number. now each of the outputs takes the form of a real number which is under the systems complete control. changing the number has some unknown effect on the environment, possibly through the action of a motor.

It is possible to design a subsystem of S, call it T that runs tests on each of the output variables x y and z individually and measures their effects on one of the input variables, a until enough information has been collected that the previously uncontrolled input variable a comes under virtual control via the intermediate output variables x y and z. S may now command a to change and the subsystem T will convert the instruction to commands for x y and/or z to produce the desired result.

The purpose of T, in a nutshell, is to bring more variables under S's control. Only one more thing needs addressing: the short supply of input variables for converting. some system must be designed to usefully subdivide them to add more members to the set of uncontrolled input variables. if a system could add useful inputs, then T could continue to convert them to virtual outputs, and S could steadily increase its control over its environment. there are a few more bugs to work out, but that is my idea of how to create a self empowering tool.

Education

Its not that education should be a career, its that every career should include education.

Just letting you know

The number of friends you have is inversely proportional to how willing you are to admit how different we all really are!

Poem

When I send my messages to you
Instead of asking "How might what he said be false?"
Ask "How might what he meant be true?"
Then you will see why I say the things I do

I generate generalizations and so do you
Consider what they mean for that which was generalized
Or the message will not have even gotten through
Consider mine and I'll consider yours too

If you fear that you may miss your chance to choose
to try the potential path that may diffuse
then remember that I have been there too
and in my message sent to you,
there is a reason for choosing one of the two.

Arguments

An argument usually ends up like a tug-of-war. When one person gives a little the other will pull in the slack and attempt to defeat the other while their guard is down. But this, as many know, is not the way to determine who is the more correct combatant. Both of the players must cooperate to begin a slow oscillation where the first player gives a little and submits to the second while the second educates the first. The first must be considerate and temporarily admit all the opponents ideas into his world view. Then they must trade places. The first will attempt to educate the second while the second temporarily admits the first's ideas. The system will try and slow down and stop for it is not naturally oscillatory. the pendulum must be pushed and pulled so that it goes further out with each swing. this is the only way I have ever experienced productivity from an argument.

A list of things to come

My blog is about many things. In the following post you will find theories of intelligence, memory, pattern recognition and many other things related to A.I. You may occasionally find postings of interesting things Iv'e found on the net. You may find theories in topics such as evolution, individuality, cybernetics, freedom, and depression. Virtually anything that sparks my interest will end up here, but i will not post anything unless I believe it is a hypothetical possibility that is worth looking into.